标题: 关于P牌的看法，老外的 [打印本页] 作者: clubfoot 时间: 2009-6-28 20:54 标题: 关于P牌的看法，老外的 1，Same reply i used for Longsword´s post:
About the quality of pantac products:
I´vehad one Pantac backpack (MOLLE AIII Backpack) and numerous pouches.They usually are copied from more expensive brands, like the AIII pack,which is copied from Eagle´s similar pack.
But although beingChinese copies, they are very high quality. I´ve never had any problemswith their products, never managed break up one.
The price/quality is just about right with Pantac.
2，Yeah, they were called Phantom before, but now its Pantac, which meansPhantom Tactical... I think. Their "clone" products are probably thebest in their class. Very close to the real ones.
3，I use a Pantac copy of MaxP Jumbo as an "tactical diaper bag".
I have a review and pictures on another board, i need to translate it to English before i can post it though.
(It is in Swedish.)
4，It is pretty good quality actually, but you can of course argue about the ripoff design.
5，Have you got a link fo this? Can't track one down anywhere!
Pantacmust be one of the cases i´ve heard, of how "quality brands"(blackhawk, etc) and cheaper brands are made in the same assembly line,with the only difference being the price and the label of course.
Inmy opinion, Pantac´s products are excellent.. I wore pantac´s pouchesfor a year in my combat vest when i was in a-stan, and never had anyproblems with those.. So don't be fooled by the price Sure, they are rip-off´s, but good rip-off´s 作者: clubfoot 时间: 2009-6-28 20:57
作者都老外，我找的都是比较积极的评价
消极点的么，在于二点，一,老翻；另外一点比较扯，有几个玩家看到玩彩弹的用P牌的，所以看不起这个牌子...作者: 痱子 时间: 2009-6-28 21:44
劳资鄙视一切不玩原品的老外作者: loveweiyao 时间: 2009-6-28 22:01 本帖最后由 loveweiyao 于 2009-6-28 23:03 编辑
Sure, they are rip-off´s, but good rip-off´s 
看不懂。。。英文都还给老师了